Blog / Radiology and medical imaging

How to Learn Radiology from Books, in Order

August 9, 2026 · 4 min read

Start with Bettyann Kevles's Naked to the bone and then William Herring's Learning radiology. The first is a 378-page narrative history of how X-rays, ultrasound, CT, MRI and PET were invented and what each changed about what medicine could see; it needs no technical background and it gives every textbook that follows a reason to exist. The second is the book most students actually learn from and the best single purchase here — Herring teaches recognition rather than lists, building one pattern per chapter, showing it normal, then showing it broken.

Two warnings before the list proper. These are clinical textbooks rather than popular science, and from Herring onward they assume gross anatomy vocabulary from page one; they are also a field overview, not a guide to interpreting your own scans, and no book replaces the radiologist reading them. And several records here sit at older editions than the current print run, which is noted below — for the introductory texts that barely matters, but for CT, MRI and anything touching dose or protocol you want the newest edition you can get.

Stage one: the introductory texts, at medical-student level

Erkonen and Smith's Radiology 101 is the gentlest entry, teaching the modalities one at a time and explaining what physical property each measures before showing a single case. Take it first if the difference between a hypodense and a hypointense lesion is not yet second nature. Herring follows, and Harjit Singh's Radiology Fundamentals runs alongside as a short, deliberately non-exhaustive second pass in a different voice, aimed at students and non-radiologist clinicians who need to order and interpret studies competently.

Stage two: the chest film, at junior-clinician level

This is the one study every doctor is expected to read unaided, and the stage assumes stage one. Jonathan Corne's Chest X-Ray Made Easy is the shortest useful book on it: a systematic routine and the common patterns in about 156 pages. De Lacey, Morley and Berman's The chest X-ray is the case-led drill, organised around the findings that are actually missed and showing the normal appearances that mimic them alongside.

Then Felson's principles of chest roentgenology, the classic programmed text, built around the silhouette sign and the air bronchogram — the two ideas that let you say where in the chest an opacity sits rather than merely that it is there. Its question-and-answer format rewards working through it slowly rather than reading it. Our record is an earlier edition of a book that has been revised several times; seek the current one. Nigel Raby's Accident and Emergency Radiology applies all of it, organised around commonly missed injuries, and assumes you already have a search pattern.

Stage three: the references and cross-sectional imaging, at resident level

Novelline's Squire's fundamentals of radiology is the bridge — broader than Herring, organised by body system, still readable straight through. Brant and Helms's Fundamentals of diagnostic radiology is the standard single-source reference residents use and the book most departments keep on the shelf; at 1,572 pages in our record's mid-2000s edition it is used by system and by problem, not cover to cover, and later editions expand the cross-sectional and MRI material considerably. Webb and Brant's Fundamentals of body CT is the focused companion for the modality now carrying most of the diagnostic load, and it teaches CT anatomy plane by plane before pathology, which is the correct order and the one self-taught readers skip. Westbrook and Talbot's MRI in practice explains T1, T2, sequence selection and artefact in terms a clinician can follow.

These are large and expensive; a library or departmental copy is the sane approach. Edition currency matters much more in this stage than in the first, because protocols and dose guidance have moved.

Stage four: the physics, and it is genuinely harder

Optional for a clinician, compulsory for anyone entering the specialty or medical physics, and assuming comfort with basic physics and maths. Christensen's physics of diagnostic radiology is the standard teaching text for trainees and explains image quality — contrast, noise, resolution, scatter — as a set of trade-offs rather than a list of facts; read it before Johns, it is the more forgiving. Harold Johns's The physics of radiology is the rigorous treatment, reaching into radiotherapy physics as well.

Edition age is a real problem in this stage specifically. Our Christensen record is a 1990 edition and the Johns record a very early printing of a book that ran for decades. The underlying physics does not change; equipment, dose figures and regulatory guidance do, so treat any dose numbers in an old printing as historical and take current ones from a current source. The staged path, with study plans, is at /paths/pt_ai_radiology-and-medical-imaging.

FAQ

Can I learn to read my own scans from these books?
No, and that is not a hedge. These are teaching texts for people working inside a clinical system that supplies the prior imaging, the history, the indication and a colleague to check the finding against, and radiology training is built around volume — thousands of studies, with feedback — rather than around reading. What the path does give a non-clinician is a real understanding of what each modality measures, why one study is ordered rather than another, and what a report is actually claiming. Any question about your own imaging belongs with the clinician who ordered it.
Does it matter that several of these records are older editions?
It depends on the stage. For the introductory texts and the chest film books, very little: the silhouette sign, the air bronchogram and the search patterns they teach have not changed, and an older Felson or Squire's is perfectly usable. It matters a great deal for the reference works and the physics. CT and MRI protocols, dose guidance and regulatory limits have all moved, so an older Brant and Helms understates the cross-sectional material and a 1990 physics text should be read for the concepts with any dose figure taken from a current source.

Get the books

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Some book links are affiliate links; you pay the same price and we may earn a small commission.

Follow the full reading path

Ready to learn something deeply?

Build a reading path — free

Explore related subjects